Equal Opportunity for All? The Long Tail of Crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter

In stock
SKU
48.3.12

Open access

Publication History

Received: May 26, 2021
Revised:
June 6, 2022; June 7, 2023; October 26, 2023
Accepted: November 3, 2023
Published Online as Accepted Author Version: June 12, 2024
Published Online as Articles in Advance: August 8, 2024
Published Online in Issue: September 1, 2024

https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2023/17568 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloadable File
$0.00
Abstract

Crowdfunding platforms are believed to create a more equal-opportunity environment for fundraising by removing entrance barriers found in traditional entrepreneurial markets. Our work investigates whether in creating more equal opportunities for entrepreneurs to enter the market, crowdfunding platforms also create a more equal distribution of funds across ventures. To this end, we utilized a natural experiment in the form of a policy change on Kickstarter.com that resulted in opening the market to more players. Using platform-level analysis, we show that opening the platform shifted demand toward the head of the distribution: More funds and backers became concentrated in a smaller number of head-offers (the superstar effect). Using individual backer-level analysis, we show that these changes in demand distribution are likely to have resulted from changes in investors’ investment behavior, beyond changes in the composition of the demand side (that is, changes in the types of investors entering the market). Together, our results suggest that efforts to level the playing field in crowdfunding platforms can ultimately result in a less equitable distribution of funds across market participants, and drive investors to focus their investments on a smaller set of campaigns.

Additional Details
Author Hilah Geva, Ohad Barzilay, Anat Goldstein, and Gal Oestreicher-Singer
Year 2024
Volume 48
Issue 3
Keywords long tail, crowdfunding, Kickstarter, platform openness, policy change, peer economy, peer-to-peer platforms, Gini, demand distribution, natural experiment, superstar effect, quality signals
Page Numbers 1223-1238
Copyright © 2024 MISQ. All rights reserved.