Multifarious Roles and Conflicts on an Interorganizational Green IS

In stock

Publication History

Received: August 6, 2017
Revised: November 9, 2018; February 28, 2020; October 6, 2020; February 12, 2021; March 12, 2021
Accepted: March 27, 2021
Published online: February 15, 2022

Downloadable File
Under increasing pressure to demonstrate environmental responsibility, organizations realize that they cannot claim to be environmentally sustainable if their supply chains are not. This research seeks to understand how an interorganizational green IS influences environmental sustainability (ES) initiatives within organizations in a supply chain. We examine a green IS taking the form of an interorganizational ES platform. Our analysis gives insight into how role conflicts arising from the various roles played by the platform users compromise the nature of actions associated with platform beliefs. In particular, cooptition conflict arising from participants’ roles as supplier to the platform owner and competitor to other platform participants explains the symbolic organizational content contribution, whereas the professional conflict resulting from participants’ roles as employee of an organization and knowledge peer to participants from other organizations explains the substantive personal content contribution. The lack of organizational substantive content creates content paucity, which platform users respond to by developing off-platform relationships with content contributors. The personal ES knowledge acquired through platform content consumption and the relationships with content contributors help individuals advocate for ES initiatives within their organizations. Our research is among the first to consider green IS at an interorganizational level and the corresponding multilevel perspective of the green IS users as they are at once organizational and individual actors.
Additional Details
Author Dorothy E. Leidner, Juliana Sutanto, and Lazaros Goutas
Year 2022
Volume 46
Issue 1
Keywords Green IS, interorganizational green IS, role theory, role conflict, belief–action–outcome framework, environmental sustainability
Page Numbers 591-608; DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2022/15116
Copyright © 2023 MISQ. All rights reserved.